Integrators Are Rebuilding the Fire Alarm Monitoring Model

By Andrew Erickson

August 22, 2025

The fire alarm industry has never been static. But over the last decade (and especially in the last five years), the entire model for specifying, installing, and monitoring fire alarm systems has seen a profound shift.

It's a shift that's impacting engineered systems distributors, electrical contractors, and integrators alike. Some are responding by doubling down on legacy solutions. Others are adapting and carving out new areas of value.

Recently, we spoke with a seasoned industry expert who's been working in fire alarm systems since the 1970s. What emerged from that conversation was a clear picture of where the industry is heading - and where there are still gaps that need to be filled.

Let's walk through what's changing, why legacy solutions are increasingly failing, and what integrators really need today to fill the void.

Integrator Monitoring Model

The Traditional Model Uses "Parts and Smarts" in a World of Mandates

If you've worked in this industry for more than a minute, you know the "parts and smarts" model:

  • Electrical contractors handle the wiring, physical installation, and code-driven device mounting.
  • Engineered systems distributors (ESDs) handle the smarts: selecting panels, performing system design, doing permit drawings, commissioning systems, and providing monitoring.

The separation of labor has worked for decades, largely because it aligns with how contractors, authorities having jurisdiction (AHJs), and building owners expect things to be done.

In our conversation with a fire alarm veteran, he confirmed what many others know: the contractor wants no part of ongoing monitoring or troubleshooting. And that's for a good reason. They're not structured for long-term service.

As a result, the "brains" of the operation fall squarely to the ESDs and, in some cases, alarm dealers. These are the people who:

  • Handle testing and inspection
  • Provide long-term monitoring
  • Coordinate with architects, engineers, and end clients
  • Need tools that are compatible with a wide range of fire alarm panels, comm methods, and system designs

This model has always depended on technology working within a relatively predictable ecosystem: panels from major manufacturers, common wiring methods (often POTS lines), and centralized head-ends that talk to everything.

However, today, that model is breaking down.

The Monitoring Landscape Is No Longer Working

The most obvious culprit in the changing fire alarm world is POTS-line elimination.

Those old copper phone lines that once served as the backbone for alarm communication are disappearing fast. Municipalities are actively removing support and carriers are sunsetting services. Plus, (as always happens as a technology becomes obsolete) prices are rising - or service is being eliminated entirely.

As a result, clients and integrators are being forced to switch to IP or cellular communications. Unfortunately, that switch isn't always clean or consistent. Many campuses and municipal clients have hybrid systems - mixing copper, radio, IP, and cellular in different parts of the same project.

That creates a new kind of challenge for the ESD or integrator:

  • How do you bring all these signals into one monitoring interface?
  • How do you unify legacy panels with modern communicators?
  • How do you avoid being locked into a single manufacturer's ecosystem, especially if you're working with multi-vendor sites?

And most importantly: How do you give clients the ability to monitor their own fire systems (self-monitoring), especially when that's becoming increasingly popular - and sometimes even mandated?

Let's consider a real-world example from a recent project.

What the Ideal Solution Should Look Like

Suppose you're working with a university campus - a common client type mentioned by the integrator we spoke with. They've got:

  • Older academic buildings with RS-232 printer ports on their FACPs
  • Newer dorms using IP-based communicators
  • A central security kiosk in a parking structure where alarms need to be monitored
  • A desire to monitor their own systems, without relying on an external third-party monitoring company
  • A mandate for UL 864 compliance to meet local code

Now imagine you try to "bolt on" a traditional solution. One panel requires proprietary software, another uses only dry contact outputs, and a third is already sending contact ID to a central station - but they want out.

This kind of "Frankensteining" isn't hypothetical. It's reality for many campus-style clients, including:

  • Universities (like Caltech, referenced in our team's client base)
  • Government housing authorities
  • Hospitals and military bases
  • Transportation hubs
  • Municipal buildings with in-house surveillance and fire personnel

For environments like this, the ideal solution is one that can:

  • Communicate with any panel, old or new
  • Use whatever transport is available (IP, radio, cellular, dry contact, RS-232)
  • Bring data to a single, centralized head-end
  • Display both real-time and historical events
  • Provide point-specific data if available, or at least zone-level via dry contact
  • Be programmed without proprietary software or hard-to-learn logic rules
  • Pass the UL 864 test so the AHJ doesn't raise red flags

This is where many traditional solutions fail to meet all of the necessary requirements. These solutions were built for yesterday's infrastructure, not today's complexity.

Digitize Bridges the Gap: The Prism LX + DGM System

If you're an engineered systems distributor, alarm dealer, or design engineer, the Prism LX is the kind of tool that gives you flexibility, compliance, and long-term value without locking you into a single ecosystem.

So what is it?

At its core, the Prism LX is a central monitoring head-end. It's installed at a client's security office, monitoring station, or command center. From there, it gathers alarm data from any number of remote panels via Digitize's Data Gathering Modules (DGMs).

Each DGM can be configured to talk to different types of panels using:

  • Dry contacts (for basic alarm/supervisory/trouble monitoring)
  • RS-232 printer ports (for richer point-specific data if available)
  • Contact ID protocols
  • Other compatible communicator outputs

You simply install the DGM at the panel, configure its communication path (IP, copper pair, radio, etc.), and send the data back to the Prism LX head-end. The programming is done locally, directly on the box. That way, you avoid external PC software and complex logic trees.

When you have a large number of buildings or mixed-system environments, this approach simplifies everything. You get one monitoring dashboard. You get a repeatable architecture that works across brands and generations.

Need a Windows-based PC for operators? Digitize offers a Remote Annunciator running proprietary software that visualizes incoming alarms and displays historical data.

Plus, if you need UL compliance, Digitize's system is UL 864 listed, with certification through Intertek. In fact, the Prism LX now also carries UL credentials directly to satisfy the most conservative AHJs.

The Prism LX is designed specifically for deployments across a hybrid infrastructure.

Get the Right Fit for the Right Clients

One of the more interesting takeaways from our conversation with the industry expert was this: housing authorities and municipal organizations are often the most overlooked but best-fit clients for this type of solution.

This happens to be the case because these organizations typically:

  • Operate multi-building campuses
  • Have their own Metro police or security departments
  • Manage fire, access control, and surveillance in-house
  • Are spending taxpayer dollars, which makes them more willing to invest in long-term, flexible systems
  • Want to monitor their own systems - without outsourcing the entire fire alarm ecosystem to a third party

Integrators working with these groups often find themselves trying to glue together systems from five different vendors. Then, they find that none of them really work well together.

This is exactly where Digitize's platform serves you well. We don't care whose panel you use and we don't make you upgrade your entire building. We just get the data and help you make it visible and manageable.

Low-Lift Installation for Integrators

Let's not forget another major point made in the conversation: integrators don't want complexity.

With the Prism LX and DGMs, the installation is deliberately simple:

  • Mount the DGM near the panel
  • Connect to dry contacts, serial output, or communicator (depending on the model)
  • Plug the unit into the network, or configure radio/copper connectivity
  • Power it up and assign it to the head-end

There's no proprietary software required. The system is designed with drag-and-drop conventions where applicable. For many ESDs or dealers, the entire process becomes repeatable across multiple sites, creating an ideal environment for recurring monitoring and service revenue.

What's Your Next Move?

If you're an integrator or distributor operating in this space, now is the time to think critically about your monitoring architecture.

  • Are you still relying on outdated communicators?
  • Still patching together incompatible systems?
  • Still letting POTS-line retirements eat away at your service offerings?

You don't have to let POTS retirement affect your alarms.

With Digitize, you can:

  • Build new revenue streams around campus-wide self-monitoring
  • Offer value-added support to clients in government, education, and healthcare
  • Standardize your monitoring stack across any panel and any medium

Whether you're specifying systems, designing submittals, or supporting jobs post-install, Digitize gives you a monitoring platform that works with you - not against you.

Let's Talk

If any of the following describes your business, let's connect:

  • You support campus-style clients
  • You want to build a repeatable fire alarm monitoring architecture
  • You want to move beyond single-manufacturer lock-in
  • You value UL compliance without complexity
  • You're ready to grow your recurring revenue with a modern self-monitoring solution

We'll send over:

  • Cut sheets for the Prism LX and our most-used Data Gathering Modules
  • Case studies for university and municipal deployments
  • A breakdown of distributor pricing discount tiers

Let's see how we can make this the standard for your next install.

Contact Digitize now or email us at info@digitize-inc.com to get started.

Andrew Erickson

Andrew Erickson

Andrew Erickson is an Application Engineer at DPS Telecom, a manufacturer of semi-custom remote alarm monitoring systems based in Fresno, California. Andrew brings more than 18 years of experience building site monitoring solutions, developing intuitive user interfaces and documentation, and...Read More